| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Intersection of two class abstractions. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| inab | ⊢ ({x∣φ} ∩ {x∣ψ}) = {x∣(φ ∧ ψ)} |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-clab 1093 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (y ∈ {x∣φ} ↔ [y / x]φ) | |
| 2 | df-clab 1093 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (y ∈ {x∣ψ} ↔ [y / x]ψ) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anbi12i 369 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((y ∈ {x∣φ} ∧ y ∈ {x∣ψ}) ↔ ([y / x]φ ∧ [y / x]ψ)) |
| 4 | sban 889 | . . . 4 ⊢ ([y / x](φ ∧ ψ) ↔ ([y / x]φ ∧ [y / x]ψ)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | bitr4 154 | . . 3 ⊢ ((y ∈ {x∣φ} ∧ y ∈ {x∣ψ}) ↔ [y / x](φ ∧ ψ)) |
| 6 | elin 1635 | . . 3 ⊢ (y ∈ ({x∣φ} ∩ {x∣ψ}) ↔ (y ∈ {x∣φ} ∧ y ∈ {x∣ψ})) | |
| 7 | df-clab 1093 | . . 3 ⊢ (y ∈ {x∣(φ ∧ ψ)} ↔ [y / x](φ ∧ ψ)) | |
| 8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3bitr4 158 | . 2 ⊢ (y ∈ ({x∣φ} ∩ {x∣ψ}) ↔ y ∈ {x∣(φ ∧ ψ)}) |
| 9 | 8 | cleqri 1101 | 1 ⊢ ({x∣φ} ∩ {x∣ψ}) = {x∣(φ ∧ ψ)} |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ∧ wa 196 [wsb 852 {cab 1090 = wceq 1091 ∈ wcel 1092 ∩ cin 1486 |
| This theorem is referenced by: difab 1693 dfrab2 1696 ssenen 3399 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-11 801 ax-12 802 ax-16 922 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-v 1349 df-in 1491 |