| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Step 4 of Meredith's proof of Lukasiewicz axioms from his sole axiom. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| merlem2 | ⊢ (((φ → φ) → χ) → (θ → χ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | merlem1 645 | . 2 ⊢ ((((χ → χ) → (¬ φ → ¬ θ)) → φ) → (φ → φ)) | |
| 2 | meredith 644 | . 2 ⊢ (((((χ → χ) → (¬ φ → ¬ θ)) → φ) → (φ → φ)) → (((φ → φ) → χ) → (θ → χ))) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | ax-mp 6 | 1 ⊢ (((φ → φ) → χ) → (θ → χ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 |
| This theorem is referenced by: merlem3 647 merlem12 656 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |