Statement List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 201-300 - Page 3 of 58
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | orri 201 |
Inference from disjunction definition.
|
| ⊢
(¬ φ → ψ)
⇒ ⊢ (φ ∨ ψ) |
| |
| Theorem | ord 202 |
Deduction from disjunction definition.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ ∨ χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (¬ ψ → χ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orrd 203 |
Deduction from disjunction definition.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (¬ ψ → χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ ∨ χ)) |
| |
| Theorem | imor 204 |
Implication in terms of disjunction. Theorem *4.6 of
[WhiteheadRussell] p. 120.
|
| ⊢
((φ → ψ) ↔ (¬ φ ∨ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | iman 205 |
Express implication in terms of conjunction. Theorem 3.4(27) of [Stoll]
p. 176.
|
| ⊢
((φ → ψ) ↔ ¬ (φ ∧ ¬ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | annim 206 |
Express conjunction in terms of implication.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∧ ¬ ψ) ↔ ¬ (φ → ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | imnan 207 |
Express implication in terms of conjunction.
|
| ⊢
((φ → ¬ ψ) ↔ ¬ (φ ∧ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | oridm 208 |
Idempotent law for disjunction. Theorem *4.25 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 117.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∨ φ) ↔ φ) |
| |
| Theorem | orcom 209 |
Commutative law for disjunction. Theorem *4.31 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 118.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∨ ψ) ↔ (ψ ∨ φ)) |
| |
| Theorem | pm2.62 210 |
Theorem *2.62 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 107.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∨ ψ) → ((φ → ψ) → ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | pm2.621 211 |
Theorem *2.621 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 107.
|
| ⊢
((φ → ψ) → ((φ ∨ ψ) → ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orel1 212 |
Elimination of disjunction by denial of a disjunct. Theorem *2.55 of
[WhiteheadRussell] p. 107.
|
| ⊢
(¬ φ → ((φ ∨ ψ) → ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orel2 213 |
Elimination of disjunction by denial of a disjunct. Theorem *2.56 of
[WhiteheadRussell] p. 107.
|
| ⊢
(¬ φ → ((ψ ∨ φ) → ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orbi2i 214 |
Inference adding a left disjunct to both sides of a logical
equivalence.
|
| ⊢
(φ ↔ ψ)
⇒ ⊢ ((χ ∨ φ) ↔ (χ ∨ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orbi1i 215 |
Inference adding a right disjunct to both sides of a logical
equivalence.
|
| ⊢
(φ ↔ ψ)
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∨ χ) ↔ (ψ ∨ χ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orbi12i 216 |
Infer the disjunction of two equivalences.
|
| ⊢
(φ ↔ ψ)
& ⊢ (χ ↔ θ)
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∨ χ) ↔ (ψ ∨ θ)) |
| |
| Theorem | or12 217 |
A rearrangement of disjuncts.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∨ (ψ ∨ χ)) ↔ (ψ ∨ (φ ∨ χ))) |
| |
| Theorem | orass 218 |
Associative law for disjunction. Theorem *4.33 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 118.
|
| ⊢
(((φ ∨ ψ) ∨ χ) ↔ (φ ∨ (ψ ∨ χ))) |
| |
| Theorem | or23 219 |
A rearrangement of disjuncts.
|
| ⊢
(((φ ∨ ψ) ∨ χ) ↔ ((φ ∨ χ) ∨ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | or4 220 |
Rearrangement of 4 disjuncts.
|
| ⊢
(((φ ∨ ψ) ∨ (χ ∨ θ)) ↔ ((φ ∨ χ) ∨ (ψ ∨ θ))) |
| |
| Theorem | or42 221 |
Rearrangement of 4 disjuncts.
|
| ⊢
(((φ ∨ ψ) ∨ (χ ∨ θ)) ↔ ((φ ∨ χ) ∨ (θ ∨ ψ))) |
| |
| Theorem | orordi 222 |
Distribution of disjunction over disjunction.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∨ (ψ ∨ χ)) ↔ ((φ ∨ ψ) ∨ (φ ∨ χ))) |
| |
| Theorem | orordir 223 |
Distribution of disjunction over disjunction.
|
| ⊢
(((φ ∨ ψ) ∨ χ) ↔ ((φ ∨ χ) ∨ (ψ ∨ χ))) |
| |
| Theorem | olc 224 |
Introduction of a disjunct. Axiom *1.3 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 96.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ ∨ φ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orc 225 |
Introduction of a disjunct. Theorem *2.2 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (φ ∨ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orci 226 |
Deduction eliminating disjunct.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∨ ψ) → χ)
⇒ ⊢ (φ → χ) |
| |
| Theorem | olci 227 |
Deduction eliminating disjunct.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∨ ψ) → χ)
⇒ ⊢ (ψ → χ) |
| |
| Theorem | pm2.45 228 |
Theorem *2.45 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 106.
|
| ⊢
(¬ (φ ∨ ψ) → ¬ φ) |
| |
| Theorem | pm2.46 229 |
Theorem *2.46 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 106.
|
| ⊢
(¬ (φ ∨ ψ) → ¬ ψ) |
| |
| Theorem | pm2.48 230 |
Theorem *2.48 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 107.
|
| ⊢
(¬ (φ ∨ ψ) → (φ ∨ ¬ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | pm2.67 231 |
Theorem *2.67 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 107.
|
| ⊢
(((φ ∨ ψ) → ψ) → (φ → ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.2 232 |
Join antecedents with conjunction. Theorem *3.2 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 111.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (φ ∧ ψ))) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.21 233 |
Join antecedents with conjunction. Theorem *3.21 of
[WhiteheadRussell] p. 111.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (ψ ∧ φ))) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.2i 234 |
Infer conjunction of premises.
|
| ⊢
φ
& ⊢ ψ
⇒ ⊢ (φ ∧ ψ) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.43i 235 |
Nested conjunction of antecedents.
|
| ⊢
((φ → ψ) → ((φ → χ) → (φ → (ψ ∧ χ)))) |
| |
| Theorem | jca 236 |
Deduce conjunction of the consequents of two implications ("join
consequents with 'and'").
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
& ⊢ (φ → χ)
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ ∧ χ)) |
| |
| Theorem | jcai 237 |
Deduction replacing implication with conjunction.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
& ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ ∧ χ)) |
| |
| Theorem | jctl 238 |
Inference conjoining a theorem to the left of a consequent.
|
| ⊢
ψ
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ ∧ φ)) |
| |
| Theorem | jctr 239 |
Inference conjoining a theorem to the right of a consequent.
|
| ⊢
ψ
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (φ ∧ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | jctil 240 |
Inference conjoining a theorem to left of consequent in an
implication.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
& ⊢ χ
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (χ ∧ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | jctir 241 |
Inference conjoining a theorem to right of consequent in an
implication.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
& ⊢ χ
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ ∧ χ)) |
| |
| Theorem | ancl 242 |
Conjoin antecedent to left of consequent.
|
| ⊢
((φ → ψ) → (φ → (φ ∧ ψ))) |
| |
| Theorem | ancr 243 |
Conjoin antecedent to right of consequent.
|
| ⊢
((φ → ψ) → (φ → (ψ ∧ φ))) |
| |
| Theorem | ancli 244 |
Deduction conjoining antecedent to left of consequent.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (φ ∧ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | ancri 245 |
Deduction conjoining antecedent to right of consequent.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ ∧ φ)) |
| |
| Theorem | ancld 246 |
Deduction conjoining antecedent to left of consequent in nested
implication.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (ψ ∧ χ))) |
| |
| Theorem | ancrd 247 |
Deduction conjoining antecedent to right of consequent in nested
implication.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ ∧ ψ))) |
| |
| Theorem | anc2l 248 |
Conjoin antecedent to left of consequent in nested implication.
|
| ⊢
((φ → (ψ → χ)) → (φ → (ψ → (φ ∧ χ)))) |
| |
| Theorem | anc2r 249 |
Conjoin antecedent to right of consequent in nested implication.
|
| ⊢
((φ → (ψ → χ)) → (φ → (ψ → (χ ∧ φ)))) |
| |
| Theorem | anc2li 250 |
Deduction conjoining antecedent to left of consequent in nested
implication.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (φ ∧ χ))) |
| |
| Theorem | anc2ri 251 |
Deduction conjoining antecedent to right of consequent in nested
implication.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ ∧ φ))) |
| |
| Theorem | anor 252 |
Conjunction in terms of disjunction (DeMorgan's law). Theorem *4.5 of
[WhiteheadRussell] p. 120.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∧ ψ) ↔ ¬ (¬ φ ∨ ¬ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | ianor 253 |
Negated conjunction in terms of disjunction (DeMorgan's law). Theorem
*4.51 of [WhiteheadRussell] p.
120.
|
| ⊢
(¬ (φ ∧ ψ) ↔ (¬ φ ∨ ¬ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | ioran 254 |
Negated disjunction in terms of conjunction (DeMorgan's law). Compare
Theorem *4.56 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120.
|
| ⊢
(¬ (φ ∨ ψ) ↔ (¬ φ ∧ ¬ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | oran 255 |
Disjunction in terms of conjunction (DeMorgan's law). Compare Theorem
*4.57 of [WhiteheadRussell] p.
120.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∨ ψ) ↔ ¬ (¬ φ ∧ ¬ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.26 256 |
Elimination of a conjunct. Theorem *3.26 (Simp) of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 112.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∧ ψ) → φ) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.26i 257 |
Inference eliminating a conjunct.
|
| ⊢
(φ ∧ ψ)
⇒ ⊢ φ |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.26d 258 |
Deduction eliminating a conjunct.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ ∧ χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → ψ) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.26bd 259 |
Deduction eliminating a conjunct.
|
| ⊢
(φ ↔ (ψ ∧ χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → ψ) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.27 260 |
Elimination of a conjunct. Theorem *3.27 (Simp) of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 112.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∧ ψ) → ψ) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.27i 261 |
Inference eliminating a conjunct.
|
| ⊢
(φ ∧ ψ)
⇒ ⊢ ψ |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.27d 262 |
Deduction eliminating a conjunct.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ ∧ χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → χ) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.27bd 263 |
Deduction eliminating a conjunct.
|
| ⊢
(φ ↔ (ψ ∧ χ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → χ) |
| |
| Theorem | anclb 264 |
Conjoin antecedent to left of consequent. Theorem *4.7 of
[WhiteheadRussell] p. 120.
|
| ⊢
((φ → ψ) ↔ (φ → (φ ∧ ψ))) |
| |
| Theorem | ancrb 265 |
Conjoin antecedent to right of consequent.
|
| ⊢
((φ → ψ) ↔ (φ → (ψ ∧ φ))) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.4 266 |
Conjunction implies implication. Theorem *3.4 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 113.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∧ ψ) → (φ → ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | pm4.45im 267 |
Conjunction with implication. Compare Theorem *4.45 of
[WhiteheadRussell] p. 119.
|
| ⊢
(φ ↔ (φ ∧ (ψ → φ))) |
| |
| Theorem | anim12i 268 |
Conjoin antecedents and consequents of two premises.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
& ⊢ (χ → θ)
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∧ χ) → (ψ ∧ θ)) |
| |
| Theorem | anim1i 269 |
Introduce conjunct to both sides of an implication.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∧ χ) → (ψ ∧ χ)) |
| |
| Theorem | anim2i 270 |
Introduce conjunct to both sides of an implication.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
⇒ ⊢ ((χ ∧ φ) → (χ ∧ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orim12i 271 |
Conjoin antecedents and consequents of two premises.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
& ⊢ (χ → θ)
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∨ χ) → (ψ ∨ θ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orim1i 272 |
Introduce disjunct to both sides of an implication.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∨ χ) → (ψ ∨ χ)) |
| |
| Theorem | orim2i 273 |
Introduce disjunct to both sides of an implication.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
⇒ ⊢ ((χ ∨ φ) → (χ ∨ ψ)) |
| |
| Theorem | jao 274 |
Disjunction of antecedents. Compare Theorem *3.44 of
[WhiteheadRussell] p. 113.
|
| ⊢
((φ → ψ) → ((χ → ψ) → ((φ ∨ χ) → ψ))) |
| |
| Theorem | jaoi 275 |
Inference disjoining the antecedents of two implications.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ψ)
& ⊢ (χ → ψ)
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∨ χ) → ψ) |
| |
| Theorem | impexp 276 |
Import-export theorem. Part of Theorem *4.87 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 122.
|
| ⊢
(((φ ∧ ψ) → χ) ↔ (φ → (ψ → χ))) |
| |
| Theorem | imp 277 |
Importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → χ))
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) → χ) |
| |
| Theorem | pm3.35 278 |
Conjunctive detachment. Theorem *3.35 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 112.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∧ (φ → ψ)) → ψ) |
| |
| Theorem | imp3a 279 |
Importation deduction.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → θ)))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → ((ψ ∧ χ) → θ)) |
| |
| Theorem | imp31 280 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → θ)))
⇒ ⊢ (((φ ∧ ψ) ∧ χ) → θ) |
| |
| Theorem | imp32 281 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → θ)))
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∧ (ψ ∧ χ)) → θ) |
| |
| Theorem | imp4a 282 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ))))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → ((χ ∧ θ) → τ))) |
| |
| Theorem | imp4b 283 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ))))
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) → ((χ ∧ θ) → τ)) |
| |
| Theorem | imp4c 284 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ))))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (((ψ ∧ χ) ∧ θ) → τ)) |
| |
| Theorem | imp4d 285 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ))))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → ((ψ ∧ (χ ∧ θ)) → τ)) |
| |
| Theorem | imp41 286 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ))))
⇒ ⊢ ((((φ ∧ ψ) ∧ χ) ∧ θ) → τ) |
| |
| Theorem | imp42 287 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ))))
⇒ ⊢ (((φ ∧ (ψ ∧ χ)) ∧ θ) → τ) |
| |
| Theorem | imp43 288 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ))))
⇒ ⊢ (((φ ∧ ψ) ∧ (χ ∧ θ)) → τ) |
| |
| Theorem | imp44 289 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ))))
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∧ ((ψ ∧ χ) ∧ θ)) → τ) |
| |
| Theorem | imp45 290 |
An importation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ))))
⇒ ⊢ ((φ ∧ (ψ ∧ (χ ∧ θ))) → τ) |
| |
| Theorem | exp 291 |
Exportation inference.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∧ ψ) → χ)
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) |
| |
| Theorem | exp3a 292 |
Exportation deduction.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ((ψ ∧ χ) → θ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → θ))) |
| |
| Theorem | exp31 293 |
An exportation inference.
|
| ⊢
(((φ ∧ ψ) ∧ χ) → θ)
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → θ))) |
| |
| Theorem | exp32 294 |
An exportation inference.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∧ (ψ ∧ χ)) → θ)
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → θ))) |
| |
| Theorem | exp4a 295 |
An exportation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (ψ → ((χ ∧ θ) → τ)))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ)))) |
| |
| Theorem | exp4b 296 |
An exportation inference.
|
| ⊢
((φ ∧ ψ) → ((χ ∧ θ) → τ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ)))) |
| |
| Theorem | exp4c 297 |
An exportation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → (((ψ ∧ χ) ∧ θ) → τ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ)))) |
| |
| Theorem | exp4d 298 |
An exportation inference.
|
| ⊢
(φ → ((ψ ∧ (χ ∧ θ)) → τ))
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ)))) |
| |
| Theorem | exp41 299 |
An exportation inference.
|
| ⊢
((((φ ∧ ψ) ∧ χ) ∧ θ) → τ)
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ)))) |
| |
| Theorem | exp42 300 |
An exportation inference.
|
| ⊢
(((φ ∧ (ψ ∧ χ)) ∧ θ) → τ)
⇒ ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → (θ → τ)))) |