| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A false consequent falsifies an antecedent. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| mt2bi.1 | ⊢ φ |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| mt2bi | ⊢ (¬ ψ ↔ (ψ → ¬ φ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm2.21 71 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ ψ → (ψ → ¬ φ)) | |
| 2 | mt2bi.1 | . . 3 ⊢ φ | |
| 3 | con2 82 | . . 3 ⊢ ((ψ → ¬ φ) → (φ → ¬ ψ)) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | mpi 44 | . 2 ⊢ ((ψ → ¬ φ) → ¬ ψ) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | impbi 139 | 1 ⊢ (¬ ψ ↔ (ψ → ¬ φ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 |