| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nrex.1 | ⊢ (x ∈ A → ¬ ψ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nrex | ⊢ ¬ ∃x ∈ A ψ |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nrex.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (x ∈ A → ¬ ψ) | |
| 2 | 1 | rgen 1247 | . 2 ⊢ ∀x ∈ A ¬ ψ |
| 3 | ralnex 1209 | . 2 ⊢ (∀x ∈ A ¬ ψ ↔ ¬ ∃x ∈ A ψ) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | mpbi 164 | 1 ⊢ ¬ ∃x ∈ A ψ |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 ∈ wcel 1092 ∀wral 1201 ∃wrex 1202 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rex0 1717 iun0 2028 orduninsuc 2365 cfsuc 3709 nominpos 4509 ruclem37 4921 hatomistic 5755 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-gen 677 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-ral 1205 df-rex 1206 |