| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Disjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| orim1d.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| orim2d | ⊢ (φ → ((θ ∨ ψ) → (θ ∨ χ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | idd 11 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (θ → θ)) | |
| 2 | orim1d.1 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | orim12d 436 | 1 ⊢ (φ → ((θ ∨ ψ) → (θ ∨ χ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ∨ wo 195 |
| This theorem is referenced by: nneo 4719 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-or 197 df-an 198 |