| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Inference eliminating an antecedent. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61d2.1 | ⊢ (φ → (¬ ψ → χ)) |
| pm2.61d2.2 | ⊢ (ψ → χ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61d2 | ⊢ (φ → χ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm2.61d2.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (ψ → χ) | |
| 2 | 1 | a1d 14 | . 2 ⊢ (ψ → (φ → χ)) |
| 3 | pm2.61d2.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (¬ ψ → χ)) | |
| 4 | 3 | com12 13 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ ψ → (φ → χ)) |
| 5 | 2, 4 | pm2.61i 110 | 1 ⊢ (φ → χ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 |
| This theorem is referenced by: pm2.61ii 113 tfinds 2401 imasn 2616 ndmoprcl 3058 f1oeng 3298 f1domg 3299 fiint 3445 inf3lemd 3463 axpowndlem3 3745 ltapr 3945 infxpidmlem8 4940 infmap2 4953 pjthlem13 5237 mdsymlem6 5781 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |