| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A partial order relation has no 2-cycle loops. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| po2nr | ⊢ ((R Po A ∧ (B ∈ A ∧ C ∈ A)) → ¬ (BRC ∧ CRB)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | poirr 2133 | . . 3 ⊢ ((R Po A ∧ B ∈ A) → ¬ BRB) | |
| 2 | 1 | adantrr 312 | . 2 ⊢ ((R Po A ∧ (B ∈ A ∧ C ∈ A)) → ¬ BRB) |
| 3 | potr 2134 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((R Po A ∧ (B ∈ A ∧ C ∈ A ∧ B ∈ A)) → ((BRC ∧ CRB) → BRB)) | |
| 4 | df-3an 583 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((B ∈ A ∧ C ∈ A ∧ B ∈ A) ↔ ((B ∈ A ∧ C ∈ A) ∧ B ∈ A)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | sylan2br 348 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((R Po A ∧ ((B ∈ A ∧ C ∈ A) ∧ B ∈ A)) → ((BRC ∧ CRB) → BRB)) |
| 6 | 5 | exp44 302 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (R Po A → (B ∈ A → (C ∈ A → (B ∈ A → ((BRC ∧ CRB) → BRB))))) |
| 7 | 6 | com34 36 | . . . 4 ⊢ (R Po A → (B ∈ A → (B ∈ A → (C ∈ A → ((BRC ∧ CRB) → BRB))))) |
| 8 | 7 | pm2.43d 59 | . . 3 ⊢ (R Po A → (B ∈ A → (C ∈ A → ((BRC ∧ CRB) → BRB)))) |
| 9 | 8 | imp32 281 | . 2 ⊢ ((R Po A ∧ (B ∈ A ∧ C ∈ A)) → ((BRC ∧ CRB) → BRB)) |
| 10 | 2, 9 | mtod 95 | 1 ⊢ ((R Po A ∧ (B ∈ A ∧ C ∈ A)) → ¬ (BRC ∧ CRB)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 ∧ wa 196 ∧ w3a 581 ∈ wcel 1092 class class class wbr 2054 Po wpo 2058 |
| This theorem is referenced by: po3nr 2136 so2nr 2146 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-11 801 ax-12 802 ax-16 922 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-or 197 df-an 198 df-3an 583 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-ral 1205 df-v 1349 df-un 1490 df-sn 1811 df-pr 1812 df-op 1815 df-br 2063 df-po 2128 |