| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| r19.22dva.1 | ⊢ ((φ ∧ x ∈ A) → (ψ → χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| r19.22dva | ⊢ (φ → (∃x ∈ A ψ → ∃x ∈ A χ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | r19.22dva.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((φ ∧ x ∈ A) → (ψ → χ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | exp 291 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (x ∈ A → (ψ → χ))) |
| 3 | 2 | r19.22dv 1278 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (∃x ∈ A ψ → ∃x ∈ A χ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ∧ wa 196 ∈ wcel 1092 ∃wrex 1202 |
| This theorem is referenced by: arch 4521 uzwo3lem1 4614 projlem15 5207 projlem26 5218 projlem28 5220 sumdmdi 5785 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-gen 677 ax-17 925 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-ral 1205 df-rex 1206 |