| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabid | ⊢ (x ∈ {x ∈ A∣φ} ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ φ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-rab 1208 | . 2 ⊢ {x ∈ A∣φ} = {x∣(x ∈ A ∧ φ)} | |
| 2 | 1 | cleqabi 1176 | 1 ⊢ (x ∈ {x ∈ A∣φ} ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ φ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 ∈ wcel 1092 {crab 1204 |
| This theorem is referenced by: cleqrabi 1347 nnwos 4610 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-gen 677 ax-9 799 ax-12 802 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-rab 1208 |