| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: 2-variable restricted existential specialization with implicit substitution. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rcla42v.1 | ⊢ (x = A → (φ ↔ χ)) |
| rcla42v.2 | ⊢ (y = B → (χ ↔ ψ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rcla42ev | ⊢ (((A ∈ C ∧ B ∈ D) ∧ ψ) → ∃x ∈ C ∃y ∈ D φ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rcla42v.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (y = B → (χ ↔ ψ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | rcla4ev 1403 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((B ∈ D ∧ ψ) → ∃y ∈ D χ) |
| 3 | 2 | anim2i 270 | . . 3 ⊢ ((A ∈ C ∧ (B ∈ D ∧ ψ)) → (A ∈ C ∧ ∃y ∈ D χ)) |
| 4 | 3 | anassrs 338 | . 2 ⊢ (((A ∈ C ∧ B ∈ D) ∧ ψ) → (A ∈ C ∧ ∃y ∈ D χ)) |
| 5 | rcla42v.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (x = A → (φ ↔ χ)) | |
| 6 | 5 | birexdv 1220 | . . 3 ⊢ (x = A → (∃y ∈ D φ ↔ ∃y ∈ D χ)) |
| 7 | 6 | rcla4ev 1403 | . 2 ⊢ ((A ∈ C ∧ ∃y ∈ D χ) → ∃x ∈ C ∃y ∈ D φ) |
| 8 | 4, 7 | syl 12 | 1 ⊢ (((A ∈ C ∧ B ∈ D) ∧ ψ) → ∃x ∈ C ∃y ∈ D φ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 = wceq 1091 ∈ wcel 1092 ∃wrex 1202 |
| This theorem is referenced by: 2dom 3332 unxpdomlem 3649 znq 4630 qaddclt 4642 qnegclt 4643 qmulclt 4644 qrecclt 4646 pjthlem14 5238 pjpjtht 5262 shscl 5282 shsvat 5285 shunss 5338 spanunsn 5482 pjjs 5585 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-12 802 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-rex 1206 df-v 1349 |