HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
GIF version

Theorem rdgsucopab 2984
Description: The value of the recursive definition generator at a successor (special case where the characteristic function is an ordered pair abstraction).
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
rdgsucopab.1 (zA → ∀x zA)
rdgsucopab.2 (zB → ∀x zB)
rdgsucopab.3 (zD → ∀x zD)
rdgsucopab.4 F = rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A)
rdgsucopab.5 (x = (FB) → C = D)
Assertion
Ref Expression
rdgsucopab ((B ∈ On ∧ DR) → (F ‘suc B) = D)
Distinct variable group(s):   z,D   y,z,C   z,A   z,B   x,y,z

Proof of Theorem rdgsucopab
StepHypRef Expression
1 rdgsuct 2983 . . 3 (B ∈ On → (rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘suc B) = ({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C} ‘(rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B)))
2 rdgsucopab.4 . . . 4 F = rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A)
32fveq1i 2833 . . 3 (F ‘suc B) = (rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘suc B)
41, 3syl5eq 1136 . 2 (B ∈ On → (F ‘suc B) = ({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C} ‘(rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B)))
5 fvex 2838 . . 3 (rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B) ∈ V
6 hbopab1 2112 . . . . . 6 (z ∈ {⟨x, y⟩∣y = C} → ∀x z ∈ {⟨x, y⟩∣y = C})
7 rdgsucopab.1 . . . . . 6 (zA → ∀x zA)
86, 7hbrdg 2974 . . . . 5 (z ∈ rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) → ∀x z ∈ rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A))
9 rdgsucopab.2 . . . . 5 (zB → ∀x zB)
108, 9hbfv 2837 . . . 4 (z ∈ (rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B) → ∀x z ∈ (rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B))
11 rdgsucopab.3 . . . 4 (zD → ∀x zD)
122fveq1i 2833 . . . . . 6 (FB) = (rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B)
1312cleq2i 1111 . . . . 5 (x = (FB) ↔ x = (rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B))
14 rdgsucopab.5 . . . . 5 (x = (FB) → C = D)
1513, 14sylbir 176 . . . 4 (x = (rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B) → C = D)
1610, 11, 15fvopabgf 2874 . . 3 (((rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B) ∈ VDR) → ({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C} ‘(rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B)) = D)
175, 16mpan 518 . 2 (DR → ({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C} ‘(rec({⟨x, y⟩∣y = C}, A) ‘B)) = D)
184, 17sylan9eq 1144 1 ((B ∈ On ∧ DR) → (F ‘suc B) = D)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   → wi 2   ∧ wa 196  ∀wal 672   = wceq 1091   ∈ wcel 1092  Vcvv 1348  {copab 2055  Oncon0 2199  suc csuc 2201   ‘cfv 2422  reccrdg 2969
This theorem is referenced by:  abianfplem 2999  r1suc 3496  alephon 3671  alephsuc 3672
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-un 1076  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-3or 582  df-3an 583  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-eu 1009  df-mo 1010  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206  df-rab 1208  df-v 1349  df-sbc 1441  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-if 1777  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-tp 1814  df-op 1815  df-uni 1920  df-tr 2042  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-eprel 2122  df-id 2125  df-po 2128  df-so 2138  df-fr 2169  df-we 2186  df-ord 2202  df-on 2203  df-lim 2204  df-suc 2205  df-xp 2424  df-rel 2425  df-cnv 2426  df-co 2427  df-dm 2428  df-rn 2429  df-res 2430  df-ima 2431  df-fun 2432  df-fn 2433  df-fv 2438  df-rdg 2970
metamath.org