| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Specialization rule for restricted quantification. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rspec3.1 | ⊢ ∀x ∈ A ∀y ∈ B ∀z ∈ C φ |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rspec3 | ⊢ ((x ∈ A ∧ y ∈ B ∧ z ∈ C) → φ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rspec3.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ ∀x ∈ A ∀y ∈ B ∀z ∈ C φ | |
| 2 | 1 | rspec2 1267 | . . 3 ⊢ ((x ∈ A ∧ y ∈ B) → ∀z ∈ C φ) |
| 3 | 2 | r19.21bi 1266 | . 2 ⊢ (((x ∈ A ∧ y ∈ B) ∧ z ∈ C) → φ) |
| 4 | 3 | 3impa 609 | 1 ⊢ ((x ∈ A ∧ y ∈ B ∧ z ∈ C) → φ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ∧ wa 196 ∧ w3a 581 ∈ wcel 1092 ∀wral 1201 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-3an 583 df-ral 1205 |