| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 853. By introducing a dummy variable z in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables x, y, and φ of the definiendum. Compare Definition 2.1'' of [Quine] p. 17, which is obtained from this theorem by applying df-clab 1093. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sb7 | ⊢ ([y / x]φ ↔ ∃z(z = y ∧ ∃x(x = z ∧ φ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | sb5 988 | . . 3 ⊢ ([z / x]φ ↔ ∃x(x = z ∧ φ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | bisb 855 | . 2 ⊢ ([y / z][z / x]φ ↔ [y / z]∃x(x = z ∧ φ)) |
| 3 | ax-17 925 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → ∀zφ) | |
| 4 | 3 | sbco2 913 | . 2 ⊢ ([y / z][z / x]φ ↔ [y / x]φ) |
| 5 | sb5 988 | . 2 ⊢ ([y / z]∃x(x = z ∧ φ) ↔ ∃z(z = y ∧ ∃x(x = z ∧ φ))) | |
| 6 | 2, 4, 5 | 3bitr3 156 | 1 ⊢ ([y / x]φ ↔ ∃z(z = y ∧ ∃x(x = z ∧ φ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 ∃wex 678 = weq 797 [wsb 852 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-11 801 ax-12 802 ax-16 922 ax-17 925 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-or 197 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 |