HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
GIF version

Theorem sbthlem5 3353
Description: Lemma for Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
sbthlem.1 AV
sbthlem.2 D = {x∣(xA ∧ (g “ (B ∖ (fx))) ⊆ (Ax))}
sbthlem.3 H = ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD)))
Assertion
Ref Expression
sbthlem5 ((dom f = A ∧ ran gA) → dom H = A)
Distinct variable group(s):   x,A   x,B   x,D   x,f   x,g   x,H

Proof of Theorem sbthlem5
StepHypRef Expression
1 sbthlem.1 . . . . . . . . 9 AV
2 sbthlem.2 . . . . . . . . 9 D = {x∣(xA ∧ (g “ (B ∖ (fx))) ⊆ (Ax))}
31, 2sbthlem1 3349 . . . . . . . 8 D ⊆ (A ∖ (g “ (B ∖ (fD))))
4 difss 1596 . . . . . . . 8 (A ∖ (g “ (B ∖ (fD)))) ⊆ A
53, 4sstri 1512 . . . . . . 7 DA
6 sseq2 1522 . . . . . . 7 (dom f = A → (D ⊆ dom fDA))
75, 6mpbiri 169 . . . . . 6 (dom f = AD ⊆ dom f)
8 dfss 1493 . . . . . 6 (D ⊆ dom fD = (D ∩ dom f))
97, 8sylib 173 . . . . 5 (dom f = AD = (D ∩ dom f))
109uneq1d 1610 . . . 4 (dom f = A → (D ∪ (AD)) = ((D ∩ dom f) ∪ (AD)))
11 imassrn 2611 . . . . . . 7 (g “ (B ∖ (fD))) ⊆ ran g
121, 2sbthlem3 3351 . . . . . . . 8 (ran gA → (g “ (B ∖ (fD))) = (AD))
1312sseq1d 1527 . . . . . . 7 (ran gA → ((g “ (B ∖ (fD))) ⊆ ran g ↔ (AD) ⊆ ran g))
1411, 13mpbii 168 . . . . . 6 (ran gA → (AD) ⊆ ran g)
15 dfss 1493 . . . . . 6 ((AD) ⊆ ran g ↔ (AD) = ((AD) ∩ ran g))
1614, 15sylib 173 . . . . 5 (ran gA → (AD) = ((AD) ∩ ran g))
1716uneq2d 1611 . . . 4 (ran gA → ((D ∩ dom f) ∪ (AD)) = ((D ∩ dom f) ∪ ((AD) ∩ ran g)))
1810, 17sylan9eq 1144 . . 3 ((dom f = A ∧ ran gA) → (D ∪ (AD)) = ((D ∩ dom f) ∪ ((AD) ∩ ran g)))
19 sbthlem.3 . . . . 5 H = ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD)))
2019dmeqi 2532 . . . 4 dom H = dom ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD)))
21 dmun 2536 . . . 4 dom ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD))) = (dom (fD) ∪ dom (g ↾ (AD)))
22 dmres 2584 . . . . 5 dom (fD) = (D ∩ dom f)
23 dmres 2584 . . . . . 6 dom (g ↾ (AD)) = ((AD) ∩ dom g)
24 df-rn 2429 . . . . . . . 8 ran g = dom g
2524cleqcomi 1105 . . . . . . 7 dom g = ran g
2625ineq2i 1642 . . . . . 6 ((AD) ∩ dom g) = ((AD) ∩ ran g)
2723, 26eqtr 1119 . . . . 5 dom (g ↾ (AD)) = ((AD) ∩ ran g)
2822, 27uneq12i 1609 . . . 4 (dom (fD) ∪ dom (g ↾ (AD))) = ((D ∩ dom f) ∪ ((AD) ∩ ran g))
2920, 21, 283eqtr 1123 . . 3 dom H = ((D ∩ dom f) ∪ ((AD) ∩ ran g))
3018, 29syl6reqr 1143 . 2 ((dom f = A ∧ ran gA) → dom H = (D ∪ (AD)))
31 ssundif 1764 . . 3 (DA ↔ (D ∪ (AD)) = A)
325, 31mpbi 164 . 2 (D ∪ (AD)) = A
3330, 32syl6eq 1140 1 ((dom f = A ∧ ran gA) → dom H = A)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   → wi 2   ∧ wa 196  {cab 1090   = wceq 1091   ∈ wcel 1092  Vcvv 1348   ∖ cdif 1484   ∪ cun 1485   ∩ cin 1486   ⊆ wss 1487  cuni 1919  ccnv 2409  dom cdm 2410  ran crn 2411   ↾ cres 2412   “ cima 2413
This theorem is referenced by:  sbthlem9 3357
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206  df-v 1349  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-op 1815  df-uni 1920  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-xp 2424  df-rel 2425  df-cnv 2426  df-dm 2428  df-rn 2429  df-res 2430  df-ima 2431
metamath.org