HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
GIF version

Theorem sbthlem7 3355
Description: Lemma for Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
sbthlem.1 AV
sbthlem.2 D = {x∣(xA ∧ (g “ (B ∖ (fx))) ⊆ (Ax))}
sbthlem.3 H = ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD)))
Assertion
Ref Expression
sbthlem7 ((Fun f ∧ Fun g) → Fun H)
Distinct variable group(s):   x,A   x,B   x,D   x,f   x,g   x,H

Proof of Theorem sbthlem7
StepHypRef Expression
1 dmres 2584 . . . . . . . . 9 dom (fD) = (D ∩ dom f)
2 inss1 1657 . . . . . . . . 9 (D ∩ dom f) ⊆ D
31, 2eqsstr 1530 . . . . . . . 8 dom (fD) ⊆ D
4 ssrin 1661 . . . . . . . 8 (dom (fD) ⊆ D → (dom (fD) ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))) ⊆ (D ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))))
53, 4ax-mp 6 . . . . . . 7 (dom (fD) ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))) ⊆ (D ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD)))
6 dmres 2584 . . . . . . . . 9 dom (g ↾ (AD)) = ((AD) ∩ dom g)
7 inss1 1657 . . . . . . . . 9 ((AD) ∩ dom g) ⊆ (AD)
86, 7eqsstr 1530 . . . . . . . 8 dom (g ↾ (AD)) ⊆ (AD)
9 sslin 1662 . . . . . . . 8 (dom (g ↾ (AD)) ⊆ (AD) → (D ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))) ⊆ (D ∩ (AD)))
108, 9ax-mp 6 . . . . . . 7 (D ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))) ⊆ (D ∩ (AD))
115, 10sstri 1512 . . . . . 6 (dom (fD) ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))) ⊆ (D ∩ (AD))
12 difdisj 1758 . . . . . 6 (D ∩ (AD)) = ∅
1311, 12sseqtr 1532 . . . . 5 (dom (fD) ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))) ⊆ ∅
14 ss0 1727 . . . . 5 ((dom (fD) ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))) ⊆ ∅ → (dom (fD) ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))) = ∅)
1513, 14ax-mp 6 . . . 4 (dom (fD) ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))) = ∅
16 funun 2700 . . . 4 (((Fun (fD) ∧ Fun (g ↾ (AD))) ∧ (dom (fD) ∩ dom (g ↾ (AD))) = ∅) → Fun ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD))))
1715, 16mpan2 519 . . 3 ((Fun (fD) ∧ Fun (g ↾ (AD))) → Fun ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD))))
18 funres 2697 . . 3 (Fun f → Fun (fD))
19 funres 2697 . . 3 (Fun g → Fun (g ↾ (AD)))
2017, 18, 19syl2an 349 . 2 ((Fun f ∧ Fun g) → Fun ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD))))
21 sbthlem.3 . . 3 H = ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD)))
22 funeq 2683 . . 3 (H = ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD))) → (Fun H ↔ Fun ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD)))))
2321, 22ax-mp 6 . 2 (Fun H ↔ Fun ((fD) ∪ (g ↾ (AD))))
2420, 23sylibr 175 1 ((Fun f ∧ Fun g) → Fun H)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   → wi 2   ↔ wb 127   ∧ wa 196  {cab 1090   = wceq 1091   ∈ wcel 1092  Vcvv 1348   ∖ cdif 1484   ∪ cun 1485   ∩ cin 1486   ⊆ wss 1487  ∅c0 1707  cuni 1919  ccnv 2409  dom cdm 2410   ↾ cres 2412   “ cima 2413  Fun wfun 2416
This theorem is referenced by:  sbthlem9 3357
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-eu 1009  df-mo 1010  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ral 1205  df-v 1349  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-op 1815  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-id 2125  df-xp 2424  df-rel 2425  df-cnv 2426  df-co 2427  df-dm 2428  df-res 2430  df-fun 2432
metamath.org