HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
GIF version

Theorem suc11 2341
Description: The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function. Compare Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 194.
Assertion
Ref Expression
suc11 ((A ∈ On ∧ B ∈ On) → (suc A = suc BA = B))

Proof of Theorem suc11
StepHypRef Expression
1 eloni 2209 . . . . 5 (A ∈ On → Ord A)
2 ordn2lp 2219 . . . . . 6 (Ord A → ¬ (ABBA))
3 ianor 253 . . . . . 6 (¬ (ABBA) ↔ (¬ AB ∨ ¬ BA))
42, 3sylib 173 . . . . 5 (Ord A → (¬ AB ∨ ¬ BA))
51, 4syl 12 . . . 4 (A ∈ On → (¬ AB ∨ ¬ BA))
65adantr 306 . . 3 ((A ∈ On ∧ B ∈ On) → (¬ AB ∨ ¬ BA))
7 sucssel 2321 . . . . . 6 (A ∈ On → (suc A ⊆ suc BA ∈ suc B))
8 eqimss 1548 . . . . . 6 (suc A = suc B → suc A ⊆ suc B)
97, 8syl5 22 . . . . 5 (A ∈ On → (suc A = suc BA ∈ suc B))
10 elsuci 2289 . . . . . . 7 (A ∈ suc B → (ABA = B))
1110ord 202 . . . . . 6 (A ∈ suc B → (¬ ABA = B))
1211com12 13 . . . . 5 AB → (A ∈ suc BA = B))
139, 12syl9 55 . . . 4 (A ∈ On → (¬ AB → (suc A = suc BA = B)))
14 sucssel 2321 . . . . . 6 (B ∈ On → (suc B ⊆ suc AB ∈ suc A))
15 eqimss2 1549 . . . . . 6 (suc A = suc B → suc B ⊆ suc A)
1614, 15syl5 22 . . . . 5 (B ∈ On → (suc A = suc BB ∈ suc A))
17 elsuci 2289 . . . . . . . 8 (B ∈ suc A → (BAB = A))
1817ord 202 . . . . . . 7 (B ∈ suc A → (¬ BAB = A))
1918com12 13 . . . . . 6 BA → (B ∈ suc AB = A))
20 cleqcom 1103 . . . . . 6 (B = AA = B)
2119, 20syl6ib 185 . . . . 5 BA → (B ∈ suc AA = B))
2216, 21syl9 55 . . . 4 (B ∈ On → (¬ BA → (suc A = suc BA = B)))
2313, 22jaao 330 . . 3 ((A ∈ On ∧ B ∈ On) → ((¬ AB ∨ ¬ BA) → (suc A = suc BA = B)))
246, 23mpd 46 . 2 ((A ∈ On ∧ B ∈ On) → (suc A = suc BA = B))
25 suceq 2288 . . 3 (A = B → suc A = suc B)
2625a1i 7 . 2 ((A ∈ On ∧ B ∈ On) → (A = B → suc A = suc B))
2724, 26impbid 397 1 ((A ∈ On ∧ B ∈ On) → (suc A = suc BA = B))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 1   → wi 2   ↔ wb 127   ∨ wo 195   ∧ wa 196   = wceq 1091   ∈ wcel 1092   ⊆ wss 1487  Ord word 2198  Oncon0 2199  suc csuc 2201
This theorem is referenced by:  peano4 2393  limenpsi 3400
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-3an 583  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206  df-v 1349  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-op 1815  df-uni 1920  df-tr 2042  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-eprel 2122  df-po 2128  df-so 2138  df-fr 2169  df-we 2186  df-ord 2202  df-on 2203  df-suc 2205
metamath.org