| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A syllogism inference from two biconditionals. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| syl5rbbr.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| syl5rbbr.2 | ⊢ (ψ ↔ θ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| syl5rbbr | ⊢ (φ → (χ ↔ θ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | syl5rbbr.1 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ χ)) | |
| 2 | syl5rbbr.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (ψ ↔ θ) | |
| 3 | 2 | bicomi 150 | . 2 ⊢ (θ ↔ ψ) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | syl5rbb 411 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (χ ↔ θ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 |
| This theorem is referenced by: sbco3 915 sbal2 1005 fniunfv 2860 fressnfv 2898 aceq6b 3565 alephnbtwn2 3675 1idpr 3927 leloet 4284 lerec 4411 nn0subt 4587 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 |