| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A syllogism rule of inference. The second premise is used to replace the third antecedent of the first premise. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| syl7.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → θ))) |
| syl7.2 | ⊢ (τ → χ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| syl7 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (τ → θ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | syl7.1 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → θ))) | |
| 2 | syl7.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (τ → χ) | |
| 3 | 2 | syl4 19 | . 2 ⊢ ((χ → θ) → (τ → θ)) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | syl6 23 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (τ → θ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 |
| This theorem is referenced by: bisyl7 189 syl3an3 621 eq5 824 tz7.7 2224 fvopab2 2878 f1oweOLD 2944 tz7.49 2997 nneneq 3408 r1ord 3499 ltbtwnpq 3878 nnunb 4520 atcvat4 5775 mdsymlem5 5780 sumdmdi 5785 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-mp 6 |