[Lattice L46-7]Home PageHome Quantum Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem gomaex3h6 887
Description: Hypothesis for Godowski 6-var -> Mayet Example 3.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
gomaex3h6.17 m = (p_|_ ->1 q)
gomaex3h6.18 n = (p_|_ ->1 q)_|_
Assertion
Ref Expression
gomaex3h6 m =< n_|_

Proof of Theorem gomaex3h6
StepHypRef Expression
1 leid 140 . . 3 (p_|_ ->1 q) =< (p_|_ ->1 q)
2 ax-a1 29 . . 3 (p_|_ ->1 q) = (p_|_ ->1 q)_|__|_
31, 2lbtr 131 . 2 (p_|_ ->1 q) =< (p_|_ ->1 q)_|__|_
4 gomaex3h6.17 . 2 m = (p_|_ ->1 q)
5 gomaex3h6.18 . . 3 n = (p_|_ ->1 q)_|_
65ax-r4 36 . 2 n_|_ = (p_|_ ->1 q)_|__|_
73, 4, 6le3tr1 132 1 m =< n_|_
Colors of variables: term
Syntax hints:   = wb 1   =< wle 2  _|_wn 4   ->1 wi1 13
This theorem is referenced by:  gomaex3lem5 898
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-a1 29  ax-a2 30  ax-a5 33  ax-r1 34  ax-r2 35  ax-r4 36  ax-r5 37
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-a 39  df-t 40  df-f 41  df-le1 122  df-le2 123
metamath.org