Theorem oacom2 992

Description: Commutation law requiring OA.

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oacom2.1	d =< ((a ->2 b) ^ ((b v c) ->0 ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c))))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oacom2	d C ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c))

Proof of Theorem oacom2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oacom2.1	. . . 4 d =< ((a ->2 b) ^ ((b v c) ->0 ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c))))
2		lear 153	. . . 4 ((a ->2 b) ^ ((b v c) ->0 ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c)))) =< ((b v c) ->0 ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c)))
3	1, 2	letr 129	. . 3 d =< ((b v c) ->0 ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c)))
4	3	lecom 172	. 2 d C ((b v c) ->0 ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c)))
5		lea 152	. . . 4 (d ^ ((b v c) ->0 ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c)))) =< d
6		lea 152	. . . . 5 ((a ->2 b) ^ ((b v c) ->0 ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c)))) =< (a ->2 b)
7	1, 6	letr 129	. . . 4 d =< (a ->2 b)
8	5, 7	letr 129	. . 3 (d ^ ((b v c) ->0 ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c)))) =< (a ->2 b)
9	8	lecom 172	. 2 (d ^ ((b v c) ->0 ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c)))) C (a ->2 b)
10	4, 9	oacom 991	1 d C ((a ->2 b) ^ (a ->2 c))

Syntax hints:   =< wle 2   C wc 3   v wo 6   ^ wa 7   ->0 wi0 12   ->2 wi2 14

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-a1 29  ax-a2 30  ax-a3 31  ax-a4 32  ax-a5 33  ax-r1 34  ax-r2 35  ax-r4 36  ax-r5 37  ax-r3 421  ax-3oa 978

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-b 38  df-a 39  df-t 40  df-f 41  df-i0 42  df-i1 43  df-i2 44  df-le1 122  df-le2 123  df-c1 124  df-c2 125

metamath.org