Theorem u2lem2 727

Description: Lemma for unified implication study.

Assertion

Ref	Expression
u2lem2	(((a ->2 b) ->2 a) ->2 a) = 1

Proof of Theorem u2lem2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-i2 44	. 2 (((a ->2 b) ->2 a) ->2 a) = (a v (((a ->2 b) ->2 a)_|_ ^ a_|_))
2		u2lem1n 722	. . . . . 6 ((a ->2 b) ->2 a)_|_ = a_|_
3	2	ran 71	. . . . 5 (((a ->2 b) ->2 a)_|_ ^ a_|_) = (a_|_ ^ a_|_)
4		anidm 103	. . . . 5 (a_|_ ^ a_|_) = a_|_
5	3, 4	ax-r2 35	. . . 4 (((a ->2 b) ->2 a)_|_ ^ a_|_) = a_|_
6	5	lor 66	. . 3 (a v (((a ->2 b) ->2 a)_|_ ^ a_|_)) = (a v a_|_)
7		df-t 40	. . . 4 1 = (a v a_|_)
8	7	ax-r1 34	. . 3 (a v a_|_) = 1
9	6, 8	ax-r2 35	. 2 (a v (((a ->2 b) ->2 a)_|_ ^ a_|_)) = 1
10	1, 9	ax-r2 35	1 (((a ->2 b) ->2 a) ->2 a) = 1

Syntax hints:   = wb 1  _|_wn 4   v wo 6   ^ wa 7  1wt 9   ->2 wi2 14

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-a1 29  ax-a2 30  ax-a3 31  ax-a5 33  ax-r1 34  ax-r2 35  ax-r4 36  ax-r5 37

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-a 39  df-t 40  df-f 41  df-i2 44

metamath.org