| Quantum Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Hypothesis for Godowski 6-var -> Mayet Example 3. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| gomaex3h11.22 | y = (e ∪ f)⊥ |
| gomaex3h11.23 | z = f |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| gomaex3h11 | y ≤ z⊥ |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | leor 151 | . . 3 f ≤ (e ∪ f) | |
| 2 | 1 | lecon 146 | . 2 (e ∪ f)⊥ ≤ f⊥ |
| 3 | gomaex3h11.22 | . 2 y = (e ∪ f)⊥ | |
| 4 | gomaex3h11.23 | . . 3 z = f | |
| 5 | 4 | ax-r4 36 | . 2 z⊥ = f⊥ |
| 6 | 2, 3, 5 | le3tr1 132 | 1 y ≤ z⊥ |
| Colors of variables: term |
| Syntax hints: = wb 1 ≤ wle 2 ⊥ wn 4 ∪ wo 6 |
| This theorem is referenced by: gomaex3lem5 898 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-a1 29 ax-a2 30 ax-a5 33 ax-r1 34 ax-r2 35 ax-r4 36 ax-r5 37 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-a 39 df-le1 122 df-le2 123 |