Theorem nom53 326

Description: Part of Lemma 3.3(15) from "Non-Orthomodular Models..." paper.

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nom53	((a ∪ b) ≡3 b) = (a →2 b)

Proof of Theorem nom53

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ancom 68	. . . . . . . 8 (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ ) = (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )
2		anor3 82	. . . . . . . 8 (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ ) = (a ∪ b)⊥
3	1, 2	ax-r2 35	. . . . . . 7 (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ ) = (a ∪ b)⊥
4	3	ax-r1 34	. . . . . 6 (a ∪ b)⊥ = (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ )
5	4	lor 66	. . . . 5 (b⊥ ⊥ ∪ (a ∪ b)⊥ ) = (b⊥ ⊥ ∪ (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ ))
6	4	ax-r4 36	. . . . . 6 (a ∪ b)⊥ ⊥ = (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ )⊥
7	4	lan 70	. . . . . 6 (b⊥ ∩ (a ∪ b)⊥ ) = (b⊥ ∩ (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ ))
8	6, 7	2or 67	. . . . 5 ((a ∪ b)⊥ ⊥ ∪ (b⊥ ∩ (a ∪ b)⊥ )) = ((b⊥ ∩ a⊥ )⊥ ∪ (b⊥ ∩ (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ )))
9	5, 8	2an 72	. . . 4 ((b⊥ ⊥ ∪ (a ∪ b)⊥ ) ∩ ((a ∪ b)⊥ ⊥ ∪ (b⊥ ∩ (a ∪ b)⊥ ))) = ((b⊥ ⊥ ∪ (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ )) ∩ ((b⊥ ∩ a⊥ )⊥ ∪ (b⊥ ∩ (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ ))))
10		df-id4 52	. . . 4 (b⊥ ≡4 (a ∪ b)⊥ ) = ((b⊥ ⊥ ∪ (a ∪ b)⊥ ) ∩ ((a ∪ b)⊥ ⊥ ∪ (b⊥ ∩ (a ∪ b)⊥ )))
11		df-id4 52	. . . 4 (b⊥ ≡4 (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ )) = ((b⊥ ⊥ ∪ (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ )) ∩ ((b⊥ ∩ a⊥ )⊥ ∪ (b⊥ ∩ (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ ))))
12	9, 10, 11	3tr1 60	. . 3 (b⊥ ≡4 (a ∪ b)⊥ ) = (b⊥ ≡4 (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ ))
13		nom24 309	. . 3 (b⊥ ≡4 (b⊥ ∩ a⊥ )) = (b⊥ →1 a⊥ )
14	12, 13	ax-r2 35	. 2 (b⊥ ≡4 (a ∪ b)⊥ ) = (b⊥ →1 a⊥ )
15		nomcon3 296	. 2 ((a ∪ b) ≡3 b) = (b⊥ ≡4 (a ∪ b)⊥ )
16		i2i1 259	. 2 (a →2 b) = (b⊥ →1 a⊥ )
17	14, 15, 16	3tr1 60	1 ((a ∪ b) ≡3 b) = (a →2 b)

Syntax hints:   = wb 1  ^⊥ wn 4   ∪ wo 6   ∩ wa 7   →₁ wi1 13   →₂ wi2 14   ≡₃ wid3 21   ≡₄ wid4 22

This theorem is referenced by:  nom62 331

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-a1 29  ax-a2 30  ax-a3 31  ax-a5 33  ax-r1 34  ax-r2 35  ax-r4 36  ax-r5 37

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-a 39  df-t 40  df-f 41  df-i1 43  df-i2 44  df-id1 49  df-id2 50  df-id3 51  df-id4 52  df-le1 122  df-le2 123

metamath.org