| Quantum Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Lemma for Sasaki implication study. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| u1lemnanb | ((a →1 b)⊥ ∩ b⊥ ) = (a ∩ b⊥ ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | u1lemob 612 | . . 3 ((a →1 b) ∪ b) = (a⊥ ∪ b) | |
| 2 | oran 79 | . . 3 ((a →1 b) ∪ b) = ((a →1 b)⊥ ∩ b⊥ )⊥ | |
| 3 | oran2 84 | . . 3 (a⊥ ∪ b) = (a ∩ b⊥ )⊥ | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | 3tr2 61 | . 2 ((a →1 b)⊥ ∩ b⊥ )⊥ = (a ∩ b⊥ )⊥ |
| 5 | 4 | con1 63 | 1 ((a →1 b)⊥ ∩ b⊥ ) = (a ∩ b⊥ ) |
| Colors of variables: term |
| Syntax hints: = wb 1 ⊥ wn 4 ∪ wo 6 ∩ wa 7 →1 wi1 13 |
| This theorem is referenced by: u3lem14a 773 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-a1 29 ax-a2 30 ax-a3 31 ax-a5 33 ax-r1 34 ax-r2 35 ax-r4 36 ax-r5 37 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-a 39 df-i1 43 df-le1 122 df-le2 123 |