| Quantum Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Lemma for Dishkant implication study. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| u2lemab | ((a →2 b) ∩ b) = b |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-i2 44 | . . 3 (a →2 b) = (b ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )) | |
| 2 | 1 | ran 71 | . 2 ((a →2 b) ∩ b) = ((b ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )) ∩ b) |
| 3 | ancom 68 | . . 3 ((b ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )) ∩ b) = (b ∩ (b ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ ))) | |
| 4 | a5c 113 | . . 3 (b ∩ (b ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ ))) = b | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | ax-r2 35 | . 2 ((b ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )) ∩ b) = b |
| 6 | 2, 5 | ax-r2 35 | 1 ((a →2 b) ∩ b) = b |
| Colors of variables: term |
| Syntax hints: = wb 1 ⊥ wn 4 ∪ wo 6 ∩ wa 7 →2 wi2 14 |
| This theorem is referenced by: u2lemnonb 658 u21lembi 709 bi3 821 bi4 822 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-a1 29 ax-a2 30 ax-a5 33 ax-r1 34 ax-r2 35 ax-r4 36 ax-r5 37 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-a 39 df-i2 44 |