Theorem u5lem2 730

Description: Lemma for unified implication study.

Assertion

Ref	Expression
u5lem2	(((a →5 b) →5 a) →5 a) = (a ∪ ((a⊥ ∩ b) ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )))

Proof of Theorem u5lem2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		u5lemc1b 667	. . . 4 a C ((a →5 b) →5 a)
2	1	comcom 435	. . 3 ((a →5 b) →5 a) C a
3	2	u5lemc4 687	. 2 (((a →5 b) →5 a) →5 a) = (((a →5 b) →5 a)⊥ ∪ a)
4		u5lem1n 725	. . . 4 ((a →5 b) →5 a)⊥ = ((a⊥ ∩ b) ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ ))
5	4	ax-r5 37	. . 3 (((a →5 b) →5 a)⊥ ∪ a) = (((a⊥ ∩ b) ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )) ∪ a)
6		ax-a2 30	. . 3 (((a⊥ ∩ b) ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )) ∪ a) = (a ∪ ((a⊥ ∩ b) ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )))
7	5, 6	ax-r2 35	. 2 (((a →5 b) →5 a)⊥ ∪ a) = (a ∪ ((a⊥ ∩ b) ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )))
8	3, 7	ax-r2 35	1 (((a →5 b) →5 a) →5 a) = (a ∪ ((a⊥ ∩ b) ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )))

Syntax hints:   = wb 1  ^⊥ wn 4   ∪ wo 6   ∩ wa 7   →₅ wi5 17

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-a1 29  ax-a2 30  ax-a3 31  ax-a4 32  ax-a5 33  ax-r1 34  ax-r2 35  ax-r4 36  ax-r5 37  ax-r3 421

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-b 38  df-a 39  df-t 40  df-f 41  df-i5 47  df-le1 122  df-le2 123  df-c1 124  df-c2 125

metamath.org